I don't see how it's a walk back to rescind a memo stating you're doing an across-the-board freeze and then come out and say you're still doing a freeze. Sounds like talking out both sides of their mouth.
Addendum: states are filing the press secretary's tweet regarding the freeze still being active as evidence that the suits are not moot.
Addendum 3: Judge will grant a restraining order saying the withdrawal of the "hugely ambiguous" OMB order is a distinction without difference "based on the comments by the president's press secretary".
Sure Steve: sounds real professional and competent.
As I commented on your previous post, deal with the blowback and adapt as necessary to get things done. Changes to the federal system will never happen otherwise. There is no time to waste on initial perfection. The final product is what counts.
I'm probably the most sincere commenter on this site. Sincere like nothing you've ever seen before. I have faith that any of Trump's policy pronouncements that make it through the legal and congressional challenges will be Constitutional in every regard. Beneficial ends do justify any legitimate means.
I don't see how it's a walk back to rescind a memo stating you're doing an across-the-board freeze and then come out and say you're still doing a freeze. Sounds like talking out both sides of their mouth.
Addendum: states are filing the press secretary's tweet regarding the freeze still being active as evidence that the suits are not moot.
Addendum 2: yes, it was done via Tweet. https://x.com/PressSec/status/1884672871944901034
Addendum 3: Judge will grant a restraining order saying the withdrawal of the "hugely ambiguous" OMB order is a distinction without difference "based on the comments by the president's press secretary".
Sure Steve: sounds real professional and competent.
As I commented on your previous post, deal with the blowback and adapt as necessary to get things done. Changes to the federal system will never happen otherwise. There is no time to waste on initial perfection. The final product is what counts.
"Ends justify the means", rather than actually passing laws via Congress and following Constitutional processes.
And you wonder why we think you're insincere?
I'm probably the most sincere commenter on this site. Sincere like nothing you've ever seen before. I have faith that any of Trump's policy pronouncements that make it through the legal and congressional challenges will be Constitutional in every regard. Beneficial ends do justify any legitimate means.