Biden's gun plan: Plenty to hate
The president is literally peddling nonsense. It would be as if he announced a war on drugs, focusing on fentanyl-laced cocaine and heroin, by cracking down on CVS and Walgreens pharmacies.
President Biden’s plan to deal with gun crimes is a smorgasbord of stupid, and has enough in it for everyone to hate, including liberals who want to defund the police.
The president announced a plan yesterday to deal with guns and criminals. The plan is based on the premise that criminals buy guns from gun stores.
“These merchants of death are breaking the law for profit,” Biden said. “If you willfully sell a gun to someone who’s prohibited, my message to you is this: We’ll find you and we’ll seek your license to sell guns. We’ll make sure you can’t sell death and mayhem on our streets.”
It might not surprise you to learn that people who commit crimes using firearms seldom bought them at the gun store. Since mass shootings, school shooting and other tragic, traumatic events are so widely reported, and in many of those crimes, the perpetrator bought their gun just before using it, you could be forgiven if you believe the reports that this is a huge problem.
As with many “it bleeds, it leads” reports, it lacks statistical context. For example, if you look at shark attacks, since anytime it happens, it’s generally news, at the beach you might keep a weather eye out for the nasty fin in the water. The odds of being killed by a shark in the U.S. are 76 times more unlikely than being killed by a lightning strike. Very few firearms are bought by individuals at Bass Pro Shops who then went on a crime spree.
Gun dealers are not the problem here, and it’s not even disputable.
In 2019, the percentage of guns used by state and federal prisoners obtained at a gun store is 7.5%. Just 1.2% got theirs at a gun show or flea market, but you see all this talk about a “loophole” at gun shows.
The overwhelming majority of criminals who used guns obtained them off the street or in an illegal underground market. Additionally, 17.4% of guns were found at the location of the crime or victim—the highest percentage of all ways criminals got guns after getting them from other criminals.
Straw purchases by friends or family, or gifts as a category is the second most popular way for criminals to obtain firearms. Neither of these methods has any bearing on how gun shops operate.
The president is literally peddling nonsense. It would be as if he announced a war on drugs, focusing on fentanyl-laced cocaine and heroin, by cracking down on CVS and Walgreens pharmacies.
Biden knows that crime is a problem for the average American. I’m not talking about Twitter journalists who feel unsafe in a newsroom because they might have to work with someone who triggers them, I mean Americans who worry about running into violent criminals at the mall or on the highway.
In Atlanta, this is a particularly vexing problem, given that the APD is hemorrhaging officers at a frightening rate, while violent crime is metastasizing like a sepsis on society.
Guns in the hands of criminals are indeed a problem, and criminals get their guns from one of two main sources: from their victims, and from other criminals.
To deal with guns taken from victims and crime scenes, a general upgrade in policing is not a bad solution. A better solution, perhaps, is training gun owners to properly secure their weapons. Also, there’s many really bad gun safes out there, that even the most inexperienced lockpick can snap open in ten seconds.
It makes sense that since 11.5% of guns obtained by criminals are either stolen or found at a crime scene, we can eliminate over 10% of illegal guns from the streets if we simply made better standards for gun safes and incentivized gun owners to get one.
Biden’s plan, however, is to hand out more funding, versus his own party, many of whom want to defund, local police. From the Associated Press:
“This is not a time to turn our backs on law enforcement,” said Biden, who noted that “crime historically rises during the summer, and as we emerge from this pandemic the traditional summer spike may be even more pronounced than it usually would be.”
The cash given to localities, taken from the COVID-19 relief money, can be used for policing, or for other things—it’s not mandatory to use for policing, which gives a political out for uber-liberal places like Portland and Minneapolis to not fund the police. But fringe liberals hate the fact that Biden’s plan involves giving the police more resources.
Police officials have said they are struggling with increasing crime and continued tensions between police and communities; some say their calls for support aren’t answered as they take the blame for the spike. Biden noted that $350 billion of the $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package can be used by cities to hire law enforcement officers, pay overtime, prosecute gun traffickers and invest in technology to make law enforcement more efficient.
The solution to the gun problem is, and has always been, better policing. That doesn’t mean better response times for 911 for crimes in progress (although it wouldn’t hurt). It means better investigations, breaking up criminal gangs, and stopping the flow of firearms between criminals by targeting those who recruit 13-year-olds to commit crimes, and give them guns to use.
What Biden has done in riding the fence, or trying to have his cake and eat it too, is to do not enough and too much at the same time. Everyone hates this plan.
If you haven’t subscribed to the Racket yet, click the button below to do so while it’s still free. And remember, with the Racket you get MORE than what you pay for!
You can also find The Racket News (@newsracket) on Twitter and Facebook. Join the discussion online with our Racketeers Facebook group.
Follow The Racketeers on Twitter: Jay, Steve, and David.
As always, we appreciate shares. If you see something here that you like, please send it to your friends and tell them that all the cool kids read the Racket!
"A better solution, perhaps, is training gun owners to properly secure their weapons."
My suggested approach to this goes one step further than this: gun owners should be as legally culpable for any crimes committed with their weapons, as long as the weapon is out of their control AND the lost weapon remains unreported to the police.
My thought on this is that if you do not know where your weapon is 100% of the time with 100% confidence, then perhaps you should not own a weapon. If you're not 100% confident in lending out your weapon to a friend or family member who you are 100% confident will be as responsible, safe, and secure as you are, then you shouldn't be lending out weapons.
Right now, one of the big issues - and this is related to your straw purchases point above - is that there seems to be insufficient incentives/disincentives in place to keep weapons secure so that they don't end up in the hands of criminals.
I'd also have zero problems with the state mandating that all new weapons sold include biometric identification technology to make using someone else's weapon much more difficult. We have the technology, we just need the political will to simply *allow* these technologies to come to market.[1]
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-04-15/the-smart-gun-doesn-t-exist-because-of-new-jersey-and-the-nra
He's just checking the box for the midterms. He knows it's not going anywhere and he must know that gangs don't get guns by buying them from dealer. He has a nosediving agenda and trying to get some wins chalked up. This isn't the way to do it.
If he wants to do something constructive in the gun department then he should send the feds into gang plagued Chicago.