Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris J. Karr's avatar

"A better solution, perhaps, is training gun owners to properly secure their weapons."

My suggested approach to this goes one step further than this: gun owners should be as legally culpable for any crimes committed with their weapons, as long as the weapon is out of their control AND the lost weapon remains unreported to the police.

My thought on this is that if you do not know where your weapon is 100% of the time with 100% confidence, then perhaps you should not own a weapon. If you're not 100% confident in lending out your weapon to a friend or family member who you are 100% confident will be as responsible, safe, and secure as you are, then you shouldn't be lending out weapons.

Right now, one of the big issues - and this is related to your straw purchases point above - is that there seems to be insufficient incentives/disincentives in place to keep weapons secure so that they don't end up in the hands of criminals.

I'd also have zero problems with the state mandating that all new weapons sold include biometric identification technology to make using someone else's weapon much more difficult. We have the technology, we just need the political will to simply *allow* these technologies to come to market.[1]

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-04-15/the-smart-gun-doesn-t-exist-because-of-new-jersey-and-the-nra

Expand full comment
linda's avatar

He's just checking the box for the midterms. He knows it's not going anywhere and he must know that gangs don't get guns by buying them from dealer. He has a nosediving agenda and trying to get some wins chalked up. This isn't the way to do it.

If he wants to do something constructive in the gun department then he should send the feds into gang plagued Chicago.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts