Heads they win, tails we lose
A tale of paradoxes for our nation, Joe Biden, and the immunity of Donald Trump
As it’s caddy day at the Bushwood pool, let’s jump right in. One thing is becoming evident: President Joe Biden is not in control…of his party.
There are several possible back stories here. One is that the Democrats have always wanted to boot Biden, but found no opportunity to do so until now. Another is that they stuck with him until they believed that he could not carry them across the finish line. A third is that they really had no idea how far gone the president’s mental state has become.
I believe there’s some degree truth to all three, but the fact that the Biden campaign, headed by the president, has managed to raise a ton of cash seems to run counter to the idea the first hypothesis.
It seemed that the immediate and unified response to Biden’s disastrous debate performance might have been a rehearsed form of crisis management: a scripted chorus of “step aside!” from various newspaper editorial boards and pundits, designed to inoculate the public to the age issue, while the news cycle resets over the July 4th holiday. Then, shining like a risen warrior in a hero character arc, the president would emerge, strong and confident, to take the reins of his party.
But—if it was a planned strategy or a ruse—it seems the script is working too well. Or possibly, that the calls for Biden to actually exit the race are genuine, or at least too close to genuine to tell the difference. In any case, they are spreading, and that’s bad news for the Biden campaign. Rep. Lloyd Doggett is the first Democrat in Congress to call for the president to quit.
The Biden campaign, and the president, have been strangely quiet in the face of calls for him to offer some kind of response within the party. Jake Tapper, one of the moderators who personally witnessed Biden’s senescence during the debate, noted that Democratic governors held a conference call Monday, and reported that despite a strong invitation, nobody from the Biden camp reached out to them to assuage their fears.
Chief of Staff Jeff Zients has been making calls to key Democrats in Congress, but the president has remained mum to members of Congress, NBC News reported. Instead, the president gave a short campaign stump speech from the White House on how the Supreme Court botched the matter of presidential immunity—unusual for a president to want his wings clipped. But this president isn’t worried about his own wings; he wants the other guy’s wings rendered flightless.
So the real question is: will the dam break? Both former Presidents Obama and Clinton initially covered for Biden. Clinton posted on X, the site formerly known as Twitter:
I’ll leave the debate rating to the pundits, but here’s what I know: facts and history matter. Joe Biden has given us 3 years of solid leadership, steadying us after the pandemic, creating a record number of new jobs, making real progress solving the climate crisis, and launching a successful effort in reducing inflation, all while pulling us out of the quagmire Donald Trump left us in. That’s what’s really at stake in November.
Obama posted “Bad debate nights happen.” The fact he posted this within a week of gently taking Biden by the wrist and leading him off stage, after the president appeared to “freeze,” makes it seem just a bit disingenuous.
It was also reported that Biden’s family is squarely in his corner. But if the dam breaks, how can a candidate run without the support of his party? I don’t think he can. Either President Biden must regain control of his party, and the message, or he must withdraw and allow someone else who can to run. But who?
A leaked internal poll by Open Labs seems to show a couple of contenders (Shannon Bream: “Wonder who leaked it 🤔”). Both Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer appear to have a distinct advantage over Biden vis a vis Trump in battleground states where Trump now has opened a fairly frightening gap.
I am not a fan of Buttigieg, whose spotty record at DOT, and lack of experience at running anything bigger than the city of South Bend, Indiana (where his accomplishments were met with golf claps), and its 103,000 residents, don’t inspire confidence in his competence. I am even less of a fan of Whitmer, whose absolutely draconian COVID-19 policies even left a bad taste in her own mouth. “We had to make some decisions, that in retrospect, don’t make a lot of sense,” she told an interviewer. Oozes strength and reason, doesn’t it?
Personally, I think the best bet for Democrats to quash Trump is to adopt the “fake it till you make it” Kayfabe crisis-management approach. Take the Independence Day weekend to mull it over, and come out saying it was Biden’s medicine. Blame the former White House doctor, Republican Rep. Ronny Johnson, who reportedly turned the West Wing’s clinic into Walter White’s lab, ready with the pills to cure what ails you. Maybe Biden took the nighttime cold meds. Or just say he over-prepped, and blame Ron Klain for trying to get Biden to respond sensibly to Trump’s avalanche of lies.
Biden even considering leaving the race would be a public admission of what everyone finally perceives as truth: the president is mentally unfit. But he doesn’t have to admit it. They can continue to pretend.
It really doesn’t matter what the excuse is. If the Democrats repent of their palace coup, and Rep. Doggett retracts his calls for the president to quit, then perhaps the media will follow suit and focus on the real problem: Donald Trump. You know the media wants to focus on Trump and make him the story. But the pull of the Big Story of a sitting president defenestrated by his own party is just too juicy for them to let go, unless something bigger comes along.
Trump’s immunity might just be the bone they need to draw them away from gnawing at Biden. Believe it or not, the media really does have sway, despite the fact that poll after poll tells us how little we hold them in regard. For Democrats, how the media is reporting Biden’s shortcomings emboldens party apparatchiks to hitch their wagons to Vice President Kamala Harris, or Buttigieg, or Whitmer, or California Gov. Gavin Newsom. For Republicans, what Fox News is covering, reaching the itching ears of all those flyover voters, determines if they think it’s safe to peek out from behind the red MAGA hat they’re hiding behind, while secretly despising their candidate.
For all Trump’s many failings, he does seem to have the Republican Party by the ears. And that leads me to where I was heading for the last 15 paragraphs (it took every word to get here).
If the election were held today, Trump, awaiting sentencing for 34 felonies in New York, would be president-elect. The real election is coming sooner than it appears in the media, and somehow, in the reality-distortion zone occupied by the Orange Guy, his many prosecutions turn into opportunities for heroism. Let the justifications fly like a Baby Ruth flung into the pool.
First, if you believe that J6 was a peaceful demonstration interrupted by FBI plants who were there to incite the few violent anarchist groups and got out of control, then you are hopeless. There’s quite a few hopeless people, and they were helped along by a media made rabid in its pursuit of Trump and anyone who would dare support him.
From Day One, when the Washington Post began its coverage of the Trump administration with “At the moment the new commander in chief was sworn in, a campaign to build public support for his impeachment went live,” to the staged violent protests at his inauguration (I was there, and saw it with my own eyes), to the endless Russia investigations, to the libel suit WaPo settled with MAGA-hat wearing teenager Nick Sandmann, the walls never stopped closing in.
These constant attacks galvanized Trump supporters into brothers-in-arms, engaged in a forever war with the leftist media. Trumpworld even has its own patron saint, Rush Limbaugh, who watches from heaven. By the time COVID hit, the election tainted by the virus (courts ruling left and right over how to handle unprecedented numbers of mail-in ballots) happened, and Trump’s own prediction of his loss happened just as he said it would, the Big Lie found fertile soil.
Anti-Trump media has told so many lies; the government itself pressured social media sites to suppress real stories like Hunter Biden’s laptop, and has covered for Joe Biden’s loss of mental acuity, that even Trump’s obvious lies seem almost prophetic to his supporters, and even to those who don’t support him but can’t deny the truth of what their eyes see and their ears hear.
Days after Joe Biden was sworn in, he stripped Donald Trump of his security clearance. Had Biden not done that, it’s a fair bet NARA would not have asked for the classified records to be returned. And there’d be no documents case. But NARA could not erase the secrets from Trump’s brain. Robert Hur declined to prosecute Joe Biden for keeping classified records as a private citizen, because Biden would appear to a jury as too senile to convict.
The New York case that convicted Trump was set up in 2018, when crook Michael Cohen pled guilty to two hastily tacked-on charges of illegal campaign contributions, garnering a statement from David Pecker to save his own skin. Cohen was dead to rights on tax evasion and other felonies—the feds didn’t need the election charges to convict, but they needed the charges so Alvin Bragg could bring a felony case against Trump six years later. Cohen served less than two years at the poshest of federal prison camps, then the rest of his “sentence” at his Park Avenue digs. You can forgive people for thinking Trump was set up. Yeah, he’s corrupt, he falsified records. I still don’t know how much money Joe Biden falsified.
And now, we have people like Erick Erickson, whom I respect greatly, saying on social media, “The freak out about the Supreme Court decisions this week tell you just how vital and necessary Project 2025 is. There must be a purge of left wing bureaucrats.” If you don’t know, that’s Schedule F, and the Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025.”
I say, be careful what you wish for.
The Supreme Court’s immunity ruling takes the long-held judicial view of the president’s core powers, the limits of “official duties,” and acts as a private citizen, and power-drills them into the ridiculously wide net cast by Jack Smith’s federal “fraud upon the American people” case in Washington, D.C. If you want to get into the technical parts of that ruling, read David Thornton’s excellent explainer.
But the effects of that ruling reach much further than just one ex-president’s felony trial (part deux). Chief Justice John Roberts’ top concern is always the integrity of the Court and its rulings. His worst nightmare is having a future Court have to unwind his rulings. But this one is difficult, in a heads I win, tails you lose kind of way.
Dissent on the Roberts and Co. opinion is fairly easy. It’s Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” applied to corrupt acts of a U.S. president. It shouldn’t matter whether then-President Donald Trump was working within his core constitutional powers, or his official duties, or as a private citizen, if his goal was the dismantling of America’s peaceful transfer of power, by calling a mob to Washington and setting them to march upon the Capitol, erect a gallows to hang his own vice president, and prevent Congress from certifying his opponent’s electoral college results.
Whether it’s black-letter legal or not, the acts of a corrupt man in power are corrupt, and therefore should be subject to justice. Allowing the color of law to grant immunity to those acts would seem to be a travesty on the order of Admiral Karl Dönitz’ defense at Nuremberg. Dönitz, the Reichsführer at the time the war officially ended, was just following orders, and the laws of his country. And actually, he was, but Germany lost the war, so he faced the death penalty with the other Nazis. Yet Dönitz escaped the hangman, earning only a ten year prison sentence. He lived to the age of 89, dying in 1980, without repenting even once.
Chief Justice Roberts has chosen to live by the law, and to try to avoid the inherent paradoxes in pursuing justice for obvious crimes against our republic. Allowing one president to declare the acts of another to be criminal, while the other president sat in the same office, with the same powers, performing the same duties, is a legal paradox. Congress could well criminalize anything a president did, constraining one from firing the prosecutors hired by his predecessor to bring charges against him, under the threat of further prosecution. It has the ring of political banana-republic justice to it.
In exchange for the Faustian bargain to protect the good acts of a man of integrity and character in the seat of POTUS, Roberts and his fellow Justices gave up the ability to stop ambitious men from corrupting the power itself. This means, within the strict interpretation of the immunity ruling, that Trump’s implementation of Schedule F, and most of the “2025 Project,” is unassailable, and even immune from judicial review. Trump could well fire the entire staff of lawyers at the Department of Justice, as well as ten thousand mid-level bureaucrats in every federal executive department, replacing them with lists, culled and vetted by Heritage Foundation staffers. It very well may be impossible to challenge those acts in federal court.
The question here is whether the Republican Party, and voters, will follow Trump and Heritage into their glorious future. Because we know “personnel is policy,” as the Reagan-era slogan goes. And the GOP’s policy is to do whatever hare-brained whim the Orange Guy says. (Really, that’s the platform: opposing the far-left. Read it for yourself.)
Of course, voters could just reject Trump and stay with Biden, or whoever the panicked Democrats put in his place. Or they can go full crazy and end up with the likes of RFK, Jr. (won’t happen). But it’s likely that the drumbeat of lies, sins, coverups, and constant attacks upon people who grow tired of being attacked, taken for granted, or just ignored, will lead to a Trump victory, or a very, very close election that Trump could claim was “rigged” once again.
I am not one to go in for doomsday scenarios. The GOP is not the Nazi Party. There will not be a “night of the long knives” when Trump jails his closest advisers in order to consolidate his own power, a la Vladimir Putin. There is no paramilitary wing of Trumpworld. Well, actually, there is, and we’ve seen it and its vast capabilities (I kid). The Q’Anon Shaman, Jacob Chansley, has indicated his intent to run for Congress when he completes his prison term. Another felon, why not?
But really, if Trump appoints his list, those people will be as lost as sheep without a border collie, and the federal government will screech to an incompetent halt. People will scream for their services to be restored. Government cheese will go bad. Ethanol subsidies will fail to be paid, and the good faith and credit of the United States will be damaged. So Trump, who values money above all things, in that money allows him to be the celebrity he pathologically needs to be, won’t let it happen.
The lists, the threat of jailing opponents, the dark predictions, these are possibilities, but mostly they are fantasies of people who have something to sell you. I am not saying Trump deserves your vote. He doesn’t. But the Supreme Court, and Chief Justice Roberts, don’t think that the world will end if Trump is elected and executes the core constitutional powers of the U.S. president. If they thought that, they’d have sacrificed the law and gone for justice.
Our choice is whether we want a visibly old man in mental and physical decline to run the country between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, with occasional trips overseas, or a pariah to the left, and a likely friend of Marine Le Pen and other nationalists. Heads they win, tails we lose.
SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS: You can follow us on social media at several different locations. Official Racket News pages include:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewsRacket
Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/NewsRacket
Mastodon: https://federated.press/@RacketNews
We aren’t on Threads as a news page yet, but both David and I have personal accounts there:
David: https://www.threads.net/@captainkudzu71
Steve: https://www.threads.net/@stevengberman
Our personal accounts on the platform formerly known as Twitter:
David: https://twitter.com/captainkudzu
Steve: https://twitter.com/stevengberman
Jay: https://twitter.com/curmudgeon_NH
Thanks again for subscribing! Don’t forget to share us with your friends!
I’m just going to say that a lot of people didn’t believe the worst-case scenarios about Trump in 2020.
I'm still on the ledge, Steve.
And for the commenters who think that this is me being hysterical because SCOTUS probably just gave Trump another way to shirk accountability, I'll say this: If I had the power to erase this SCOTUS ruling at the cost of prosecuting Trump for anything and continuing to leave the door open to his return to power, I'd take that deal in a heartbeat. Let Trump win in November and not see the inside of the jail cell, if it means restoring the balance to the separation of powers that we enjoyed last Sunday.