Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bill Pearson's avatar

I asked the question "why?" the other day and Rubio just told us all: ""The president made the very wise decision—we knew that there was going to be an Israeli action, we knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties."

So the correct answer was: a). Body bags for Bibi.

But wait, it gets worse, because trump can't help himself when he said this: “And sadly, there will likely be more before it ends. That’s the way it is.”

Sure, he expressed his grief for the fallen soldiers, but then he stuffed it all in the summary: "That's the way it is." Meh.

War and death aside (sounding trump-like), thanks for the history lesson Steve, you amaze me with your knowledge and one of the reasons i continue to follow The Racket.

SGman's avatar
Mar 3Edited

If Trump could have made a good case then Congress may well have done so - but then he'd have to have decided on the reason(s) why this war was necessary now, and have had a real plan to execute it.

Instead we get conflicting reasons: we want the people to rise up, but we're willing to let the regime stay in place; knows who he wants to have take power, but they were killed at the onset. It does not generate confidence in the administration, along with their very glib statements about dead servicemembers.

We've got the Secretary of Defense saying that servicemembers killed by a missile were in a fortified location, but they were really in a trailer.

And now we're finding out that the FBI agents that Kash Patel fired for being involved in the Trump documents case were also tasked with Iranian counter-intelligence. That's yet more evidence of lack of coordination and planning on the part of the administration.

33 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?