Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Charlie Cooper's avatar

The good things USAID does can't and won't be replaced with private philanthropy. A major example is PEPFAR that keeps hundreds of thousands of people alive through HIV prevention and treatment. Private philanthropy could have stepped up and funded this in the early 2000s, but it did not.

Expand full comment
SGman's avatar

USAID is minimal and provides soft power/influence for little overall cost.

Quick look at Jhpiego is the standard health and HIV prevention programs in various areas around the world.

The problem with cutting science research grants is that it then has the effect of reducing our capability and scope of research done. That then has the effect of reducing the overall advancement of the US in the long term, and thus the future economic benefits.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts