The New York Times broke a story last night that Israeli intelligence had obtained Hamas’ battle plan, at least a year before the horrifying attacks on 10/7. Normally, I take reports from mainstream media about Israel with a handful of salt, given that much of it is slanted and sloppy. But I fully believe this one.
The key paragraph is here:
Underpinning all these failures was a single, fatally inaccurate belief that Hamas lacked the capability to attack and would not dare to do so. That belief was so ingrained in the Israeli government, officials said, that they disregarded growing evidence to the contrary.
When a government is as deadlocked as Israel’s has been for the last four years, with Prime Minister Netanyahu defending himself in court from corruption charges, and seemingly-endless elections as coalitions form and then fail, it’s easy to believe that when intelligence surfaces regarding Hamas, it would not be on the top of the “important” pile. This is especially true because Hamas engaged in a years-long ruse to lull Israeli officials into believing it had moved away from bold attack plans.
Most Israelis will believe the report coming out of the NYT. How could such a well-developed intelligence apparatus such as Israel possesses, with the army, the Shin-Bet (Israel’s internal intelligence) and the legendary Mossad, not have picked up all the signals regarding Hamas plans, and even observed terrorists practicing the operation step by step?
Of course they knew.
But that doesn’t mean they knew, and believed it, and still did nothing. To harbor that thought, you’d have to believe the conspiratorial whispers that 10/7 was an “inside job,” that Israel itself collaborated in the worst act of terror on Israeli soil since the country’s war of independence was won. You’d have to will yourself to believe that some powerful Israelis valued their own influence, power, and plans, even their religious beliefs in a coming messianic age, over the lives and families of their countrymen. You’d have to believe that Israel is shot through with rot, corruption, and traitors.
There are people in America, and of course, around the world, whose hatred of Jews, in the best of times, is only masked by a thin veneer of civility. These people would love to blame Jews—and Israelis—for their own suffering. The Jew-haters are more than happy to believe that Israelis betrayed their own country and people, knowing that a large-scale slaughter was coming, in order to propel their country into a bloody war that may widen and engulf the entire region. It’s true that some far-right elements of Netanyahu’s government believe that conquering the kingdom of Solomon is the destiny of modern Israel. It’s a huge jump to conclude these fringe members of the Knesset would commit treason.
10/7 is Israel’s 9/11. Just like the U.S. “knew” that Al-Qaeda terrorists were planning something “big” before 9/11, Israel “knew” that Gaza-based Hamas was practicing for some large-scale event. Israeli intelligence, before 9/11, warned the FBI and the CIA that as many as 200 terrorists had slipped into the U.S. and were preparing for a “major assault on the United States.” They warned the operation was against a “large-scale target” and that America would be “very vulnerable.” American intelligence never connected the dots, and there was a pervasive belief that Al-Qaeda didn’t possess the sophistication to pull off such a big attack without us learning of it in advance.
Israeli intelligence, despite having the evidence in front of them, didn’t see the 10/7 attacks coming. Whether you believe the blindness was groupthink, incompetence or hubris, there’s no evidence it was willful, in the sense that people who were aware of the operation simply turned a blind eye. That’s a conspiracy theory, and a dangerous one.
The war has begun again, despite all those who said it couldn’t, like Andrew McCarthy at National Review. The Biden administration is under enormous pressure to force Israel to end the war short of its military goals, but Israel has had a full measure of restraint. On Wednesday, the final day of the ceasefire, Hamas only released eight hostages, instead of the ten Israel required. Hamas is reportedly having difficulty finding further women and children to release because they’ve been passed around to various adjacent terror groups or hidden in places Hamas leadership have difficulty reaching; or perhaps Hamas knows where they are and would rather have Israel bomb them because they’re human shields. I’d believe any of those reasons.
Israeli leadership clearly believes it has extracted all it can reasonably get in terms of hostages, before caving to Hamas’ increasing demands for delays and extra conditions. They believe the window for action was beginning to close rapidly, and that the goals of the military campaign superseded the value of holding back. If you believe that the whole operation was an Israeli conspiracy in the first place, then you’d have to believe that the people giving those orders are truly evil.
They are not evil. They were simply wrong, and were helped in their wrongness by a committed enemy who rejoiced in the barbarism of 10/7. At this point, Israel is committed to destroying Hamas, though it may not be possible. For several generations, extremist Muslims have trained Palestinian youth in Gaza to hate Jews, to desire to murder Jews, and that conquering Israel is the only worthy goal. Fighting the IDF, for a million-or-so young Palestinians, is something they feel they were born to do. Rooting out this hate will take an enormous effort, and isn’t possible while Hamas rules Gaza. In the meantime, Israel will continue to suffer losses and attacks.
How long this war will continue is anyone’s guess. But given the revelations of what Israel knew and when they knew it, it’s likely this will go on for months, if not another year or more. Even if the U.S. turns on Israel, they will continue the war. If there are traitors in the midst of the Israeli people and government, the people will root them out and administer justice. But not before justice—in whatever form Israel can muster—comes to the perpetrators of 10/7.
Hail Imperator Trump?
The word for “commander-in-chief,” in Latin, is imperator. It is also the root from which we get the English word “emperor.” Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution gives the title “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States” to the office of President. Therefore, our president, like it or not, is one step from an imperator—an emperor. Except that it’s generally taken that an emperor serves at his own pleasure, not as an elected official. So, would Donald Trump, being sworn in on January 20, 2025, should he, you know, win, like the polls, if the election were today, seems like a real thing, become a real American dictator?
A long, frightening, disheartening piece in the Washington Post by Robert Kagan paints in detail what a Trump dictatorship would look like.
Should Trump be successful in launching a campaign of persecution and the opposition prove powerless to stop it, then the nation will have begun an irreversible descent into dictatorship. With each passing day, it will become harder and more dangerous to stop it by any means, legal or illegal.
I’ve always warned against the possible consequences of prosecuting Trump for various charges could be. If he survives the trials, or somehow subverts them, who can stop him from his political aspirations? Remember, this is the guy who used his own mugshot to raise money from his followers.
Read the article, and let me know what you think in the comments.
Have a great Friday!
Unable to read the article even after giving WaPo my email address as they requested. Now, I will be stuck with their spam forever. I'll just assume the article is more made-up tripe like I've seen from them in the past. I do not believe all of the Constitutional safeguards can be by-passed to allow Trump to become a dictator. He is hated by at 50% of the voters, at least 50% of congress, 70% of the bureaucrats. five members of the Supreme Court and probably most of the upper-level military brass.
I suppose you will say I'm a participant in the groupthink that is exactly what led to the Israeli intelligence failure and could lead to a Trump dictatorship. I will continue to believe that Biden policies are more likely to lead to long-lasting damage to the USA than anything Trump could get away with.
Interesting post here Steve, (and I liked your previous post 'Will Nikki Turn?' In both posts you quoted other writers (Robert Kagan here, and David French in the other post) who are saying very strongly and urgently that Trump is a threat to democracy. (Kagan paints a particularly stark picture of just how dictatorial things might get with Trump as president).
All this leads me to ask you whether you have rethought a statement you made in a post over a year ago that you thought Trump was more dangerous out of the office (where he isn't constrained by pesky things like laws, rules and the constitution) than in office (as president). My guess would be that Mr. French and Mr. Kagan (along with just about every other pundit both on the left and on the right) would disagree with that previous position of yours.
One other reason I'm motivated to ask about your current thinking on that point is that you doubled down several times on the idea (in subsequent posts). Do you still believe Trump is more dangerous out of office than in office? Thanks.