Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris J. Karr's avatar

The Fermi Paradox asks why - given the large numbers of galaxies hosting a large number of star systems hosting large numbers of planets - we don't see a Cosmos teeming with intelligence, given that the large numbers in the Cosmos should overwhelm how improbable the existence of intelligent life is. One answer is that there's a Great Filter that all intelligent species must master before they'd be able to make their cosmic presence meaningfully known.

In the past, things like nuclear war, bio-engineering, environmental stewardship have all been advanced as potential Filter candidates. However, given some of the (frankly) insane responses I've seen to AI - OpenClaw being the latest of many - I'm starting to wonder if synthetic intelligence is that Filter.

As for Musk, he's merging his private companies now, given that last week's Tesla earnings revealed a company that completely squandered its first-mover advantages, pissed off its main customer base, and no longer wants to be a car company. With TSLA sinking, he's not going to be able to keep using that as his piggy bank for much longer, but SpaceX still has some juice for the banks willing to make loans against his shares as collateral. xAI "buying" Twitter is how he got out of that pickle he made for himself and investors, and he's replaying the same trick now with SpaceX.

Kim's avatar

Just last night, my son asked me if I ever heard of molt book. He gave me a brief explanation which sent me on a search, and the first article I read was on Fortune and it was enough to scare me. On Sunday afternoon, I was talking to my brother and he was praising AI and telling me how it was going to save the world. I didn’t want to have an argument and quickly changed the subject. I am debating sending him the article from fortune and your column this morning. It really is too bad we don’t have an agency to govern AI.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?