Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris J. Karr's avatar

Interesting commentary on the hand counting. I haven't made much noise about it, but it's been unclear to me WHO was doing the hand counting.

At our local Chicago precinct level (part of a larger ward), there are three numbers I keep a SHARP eye on throughout the election day: The number of applications for ballot (that voters fill out first), the number of processed voters in our e-poll books (where we take the info from the application, and look up whether a voter is eligible to vote at our location), and the number of ballots cast and residing in the sealed ballot box. If those numbers do not line up and you can't account for the discrepancy by factors like your ballot box is short two, due to two voters still filling out their ballot, then you're in for a Bad Day. Something's gone wrong in your process and you better figure it out and have a GOOD answer when an investigator comes along to see what's up. (Investigators will also visit to check those numbers throughout the day.)

At our precinct level, we don't have an explicit requirement to count the ballots as we're packing them up for taking them to the receiving station, but I'll do that for my own peace of mind. (Given early voting and mail-in voting, we're lucky if a third of the eligible voters in the ward show up in-person.) We place the paper ballots (which also include paper print-outs produced by the touchscreen unit) in a sealed bag that all the workers sign before a Republican and Democrat transport them to the local receiving station.

Translated to Chicago elections, it sounds like the new hand-counting requirement would have the folks in our receiving station (if a receiving station translates into a ward, which may or may not be the case) open the sealed bag of ballots we just packed (which is where the conflict with the law comes in) and recounted them to check them against the machine totals. If this is something that had been baked into the election process all along, that doesn't seem like a big deal to me, but the requirement coming so close to the election (likely after a lot of mandatory training has been completed) sounds like a recipe for disaster, as my doppelgänger has indicated.

I doubt that the entire state of Georgia being in a state of election emergency will look all that good to the rest of the nation as well. It'll be interesting to see if there's any meaningful blowback that keeps the #MAGA folks from attempting to do this elsewhere in the future.

Expand full comment
PJ Cummings's avatar

Thanks Steve

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts