Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jay Berman's avatar

This says it all

‘But the reality of it is both candidates need to lose. Squaring that reality with the fact that one of them is going to have to win is like trying to decide whether to see a shaman or a medical school dropout to have your cancer treated. You might live, but not because you received proper care. Better not to think too hard about it.‘

Expand full comment
Chris J. Karr's avatar

"None of this is good news to independents. It’s no wonder many don’t really want to apply much thought to the presidential, or any other, election, because doing so is subjecting oneself to a barrage of stupidity and abominable distortion. Thinking clearly is hard enough without wading into the pool of lies and half-truths."

Is this an election where a lot of thought IS required? We have two men who have each served 4 years as POTUS running against each other. Voters lived through both men's terms, and we pretty-well know what we're going to get. We're not being asked to speculate how 2025-2029 might turn out - it's going to be an awful rerun in either case.

Given that we have two presidents running against each other, there's not much to campaign about other than to highlight where your guy did well and slam the other guy's mistakes. As soon as Trump won the nomination, I didn't need to put any more thought into who I was pulling the lever for, and I'm sure there are others who made their decisions in the other direction at the same time.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts