Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SGman's avatar

Copying a tweet thread content from Haraldur Liefson:

"A live debate is a great way to figure out who is the better debater, who is more charming, who is better at winning a room over.

All skills that politicians need to have to be able to perform their job.

It’s however not a great way to get to the truth about anything.

Jon Stewart will win pretty much anyone in a live debate.

Yes, he’s smart. But he mostly wins because he’s good at debating, he’s done it for decades, he’s charming and funny. He knows the angles.

But he would also win the debate if he was totally wrong.

He could debate a scientist and that person would most likely look like a total fool. Even if they were 100% right on all the facts.

He could run circles around them. But that doesn’t mean he would be right.

It would just mean he’s a better live debater."

Expand full comment
Brad Sargent's avatar

You fucking dummy. Rogan is a liberal, voted for Bernie and in case you forgot , RFK is a democrat. “A platform “ for a presidential nominee???? Are you fucking kidding me??? So, your on board with censoring Someone running for president? So, your saying the American public is too stupid to hear DEBATES and make up their own mind? Why don’t you go on Rogan and debate the “facts” it was an open invitation for hostep OR ANYBODY MORE QUALIFIED. No takers, cause they know they are WRONG!!!

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts