7 Comments
author

What's your take on the provision allowing the legislature to appoint alternative local election authorities in cases of "under performance"? If I recall correctly, this isn't something that the legislature can invoke on its own, but there's a process where a local precinct(?) has to be evaluated as lacking in a performance review.

Is this largely a reaction to the circumstances that led to Fulton County's July 9th fiasco[1]? Or is it more a response to to the 2020 general elections and GA Senate runoffs, with the assumption that in a similar case in the future, a GOP legislature can wield the law to "find votes" in similarly close elections and tip the scales in close contests? Do you know of any other states that might have similar laws on the book that can serve as a guide to how that provision ends up playing out?

[1] https://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-news/fulton-state-sign-deal-to-end-investigation-of-june-9-voting-debacle/WH256PK6HZHIXLYS6GZFAHJSII/

Expand full comment

Read the Delta CEO statement on the law. He might as well say some black democrats told him the law is bad an he is sucking up to them hoping they will not badmouth Delta. The fact is that democrats hate voter ID. It discourages cheating. The only real improvement in the law is increased security of mail-in ballots. It necessitates a few extra steps and raises the price of mail-in ballots which currently ranges from $10 to $100 for fraudulent votes. Legitimate political spending for election s can

Expand full comment

She must scare the pants off of you.

Expand full comment

Good except for the part about being proud of electing Raphael Warnock.

Expand full comment