9 Comments
Jul 27, 2023·edited Jul 27, 2023

Hunter will probably get his sweetheart plea deal 2.0. No way the Garland DOJ will allow the President to be implicated in shady dealings exposed by Hunter going to trial. We will see if the judge sticks to her guns. I can't wait to see the next version of immunity guarantees.

Expand full comment

Once again you really missed the point with the Hunter Biden plea deal. The corruption in the DOJ and FBI is highlighted in the fact that both those Biden/Swamp controlled entities OK'd the plea agreement and expected it to go through. The only element that the Bidens are having a hard time controlling is the judiciary and that is the element that exposed the sweetheart deal. This whole exercise is perfect proof of the Biden controlled justice system. That is the only reason that we find Trump in the position he is in, and America crumbling at it's foundations.

Expand full comment
author

Plea deals happen all the time and are not indicative of corruption. The deal apparently was never as good as Hunter’s lawyers thought, which is also an argument against corruption.

Trump could have a plea deal too, but he won’t admit fault.

Expand full comment
Jul 27, 2023Liked by David Thornton

And no judge will allow a plea deal where there is no clear agreement/understanding between prosecutors and defendants, regardless of level of government.

Expand full comment
author

You meant “do NOT plan to vote” for Hunter or Trump. Missed the “not” in that sentence but I make bigger editorial faux pas.

Expand full comment
author

Corrected. Thanks.

Expand full comment
Jul 27, 2023Liked by David Thornton

Also, this may be missing some info:

"HUNTER PLEA DEAL: Hunter Biden’s plea deal is apparently falling apart after the junior Biden’s lawyers."

Just ends abruptly.

Expand full comment
author

That turned out to be a shorter blurb that I intended! Thanks.

Expand full comment

So the fact that this judge said that she had never seen a plea agreement like this and on the gun charge she doubted it was actually constitutional is not significant. The real problem here, with regards to the DOJ, the deal was negotiated at the level of the Whitehouse and the delaware prosecutor was not in the loop hence the difference in opinions between the two parties in the court room.

Expand full comment