1 Comment
Nov 17, 2021Liked by Chris J. Karr

Okay, who is the "Mr. Blutarsky" you imagined who did some "aggressive grade fixing", went on to Harvard, edited the Harvard Law Review, and married a woman who works at an investment bank? The "aggressive grade fixing" doesn't fit the person who might otherwise be described here.

The first part of your description, "People like Bluto have a bias to action, without thought, driven by little more than animal impulse. It’s fairly easy for such people to speechify from a position of profound ignorance..." doesn't fit, either.

As for "...but eleven thousand voters should be disenfranchised because of a few hundred spoiled ballots", where does that apply? If you mean AZ, eleven thousand was the margin of victory, but the entire state would have been disenfranchised had the electoral count challenge been upheld. That's about 3.4 million.

What's worse, my own state (PA) was targeted three times, not just the one time on Jan. 6. We had almost 7 million votes in Nov. 2020, all of which would have been thrown out had a certain Harvard alum succeeded in his blatant and repeated effort to pander to the MAGA camp.

Expand full comment