Likely Moscow drone strike had Ukraine origins, but maybe not direct government fingerprints. Feels like a measured attack to show Putin it can be accomplished. Measured to gain no real action from Moscow or Washington. Just my gut take.
Congressional term limits and a balanced budget would stop this recurring political show. There is at least one idea out there to encourage term limits without a Constitutional amendment. It involves cutting congressional pay to $1/year after the desired number of terms. Congress could pass a law requiring a balanced budget with provisions for defined emergencies.
The "fun" thing about this whole debt ceiling drama is that the GOP is getting things they could have gotten through regular appropriations: they're not getting anything special.
If the Crazy Default Caucus (forthwith known as the CDC) wants to vacate Kevin McCarthy's speakership, then I'll get the popcorn maker out - 'cause who are they going to replace him with?
The GOP has the majority in the House: they could have just passed those particular items in regular appropriations for the next fiscal year. Then there'd have been negotiations with the Senate and President.
This wasn't a battle: it was just dumb use of the debt ceiling (and global economy). Now that's off the table until after the election.
Call it what you like, but as I said, another legislative process where the Republicans have less leverage. Probably leading to another series of continuing resolutions.
Agree to disagree on whether they had more or less leverage when using the debt limit, especially as again: these were normal appropriations items that they didn't need any leverage to get - or at the least a government shutdown threat would have been sufficient (and blame in that instance would have rightly been assigned to the Democrats).
Likely Moscow drone strike had Ukraine origins, but maybe not direct government fingerprints. Feels like a measured attack to show Putin it can be accomplished. Measured to gain no real action from Moscow or Washington. Just my gut take.
Congressional term limits and a balanced budget would stop this recurring political show. There is at least one idea out there to encourage term limits without a Constitutional amendment. It involves cutting congressional pay to $1/year after the desired number of terms. Congress could pass a law requiring a balanced budget with provisions for defined emergencies.
The "fun" thing about this whole debt ceiling drama is that the GOP is getting things they could have gotten through regular appropriations: they're not getting anything special.
If the Crazy Default Caucus (forthwith known as the CDC) wants to vacate Kevin McCarthy's speakership, then I'll get the popcorn maker out - 'cause who are they going to replace him with?
That just shifts the battle to another legislative process.
The GOP has the majority in the House: they could have just passed those particular items in regular appropriations for the next fiscal year. Then there'd have been negotiations with the Senate and President.
This wasn't a battle: it was just dumb use of the debt ceiling (and global economy). Now that's off the table until after the election.
Call it what you like, but as I said, another legislative process where the Republicans have less leverage. Probably leading to another series of continuing resolutions.
Agree to disagree on whether they had more or less leverage when using the debt limit, especially as again: these were normal appropriations items that they didn't need any leverage to get - or at the least a government shutdown threat would have been sufficient (and blame in that instance would have rightly been assigned to the Democrats).