H.R.1 is a gift, so the GOP should take it
H.R.1 is a gift, so the GOP should take it
I find myself in the awkward position of agreeing with the Washington Post editorial board. But not for the reasons you think. PLUS: Shove a microphone in every Democrat's face!
Most pundits, never mind voters, have not read the version of H.R. 1 that passed the House of Representatives, and now lays before the Senate. I understand the impulse that Minority Leader Mitch McConnell feels to filibuster this thing into oblivion, counting on Sens. Krysten Sinema and Joe Manchin to preserve his minority power.
It’s a trap. Democrats want McConnell to filibuster H.R.1.
The bill won’t pass unless Sen. Joe Manchin votes for it, and he’s on record saying he won’t, at least not the version the House passed.
I believe that partisan voting legislation will destroy the already weakening binds of our democracy, and for that reason, I will vote against the For the People Act. Furthermore, I will not vote to weaken or eliminate the filibuster. For as long as I have the privilege of being your U.S. senator, I will fight to represent the people of West Virginia, to seek bipartisan compromise no matter how difficult and to develop the political bonds that end divisions and help unite the country we love.
What’s the worst outcome here? That some Republican might defect and hand Democrats the bill? That’s not going to happen.
H.R.1 is no “worse” than Georgia’s election reform act that Gov. Brian Kemp signed, which sent the liberal universe spinning into apoplectic hysteria, moving the MLB All Star Game to Denver, such a racially diverse melting pot (excuse the pun).
Example: Sec. 1005 “PROHIBITING STATE FROM REQUIRING APPLICANTS TO PROVIDE MORE THAN LAST 4 DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.” Georgia requires the last four digits of a voter’s Social Security Number when registering online.
Another example: Sec. 306 “EARLY VOTING.”
(b) MINIMUM EARLY VOTING REQUIREMENTS.— Each polling place which allows voting during an early voting period under subsection (a) shall— ‘‘(1) allow such voting for no less than 10 hours on each day; ‘‘(2) have uniform hours each day for which such voting occurs; and ‘‘(3) allow such voting to be held for some period of time prior to 9:00 a.m (local time) and some period of time after 5:00 p.m. (local time).
Georgia’s voting bill requires at least 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (8 hours), but up to 12 hours starting at 7 a.m. Under H.R.1, most Georgia counties would qualify without making any significant changes.
Sen. Manchin has offered his own version, which Stacey Abrams, fantasy league governor of Georgia, has endorsed. In a memo circulated among Democrats, which POLITICO obtained and published, Manchin outlines some quite reasonable changes that most Republicans should be able to live with.
One idea I embrace is making Election Day a public holiday (except for the USPS, I presume). I think voters should have a day off to vote. Then all the brouhaha about lines would be less strident. It wouldn’t force businesses to close—I mean Walmart is open practically all day on Thanksgiving Day now.
The rest of Manchin’s ideas, though I don’t agree with all of them, are certainly worth reasonable debate. If enough Democrats come on board and move the needle, why bother using the filibuster?
The Washington Post’s editorial board has predictably advocated smashing the filibuster if Republicans use it as intended, to stop legislation that the minority party refuses to support. But they give an out with Manchin’s proposal.
Mr. Manchin’s reforms deserve a full hearing and an up-or-down vote. If his proposal does not get its due, Democrats should consider reforming the filibuster. There is no shortage of ideas about how to adjust the procedural maneuver without abolishing it, such as demanding that minority senators show up to sustain their filibusters; requiring three-fifths of present and voting senators to end a filibuster, rather than three-fifths of all senators; or reducing the number of votes needed to overcome filibusters. These are just a few possibilities.
I find myself in the awkward position of agreeing with the Washington Post’s editorial board, but not about how to clip the filibuster’s wings. WaPo is telegraphing the Democrats plans here, though Manchin and Sinema are probably not having it.
Democrats want Republicans to filibuster H.R.1, so they can use it as campaign fodder. They want Republicans to block it, so they can claim how unreasonable, racist, and extreme the GOP is. Stacey Abrams wants Mitch McConnell to pick this hill to die on (he won’t die, even politically, it’s just a saying).
H.R.1 is a trap for Republicans to show how they can’t be bargained with. McConnell should spring it back on them by allowing debate, allowing an up-or-down vote on Manchin’s reforms, and if they pass, throw them back at the House in conference. Let Speaker Nancy Pelosi be the unreasonable one.
The House will grandstand and huff and moan, and probably not come to agreement. H.R.1 will probably die. It won’t pass the Senate as-is, and the House probably won’t agree to Manchin’s reforms. Why should McConnell waste a filibuster attempt, which is what Democrats want him to do, when it’s not needed?
And what’s the worst outcome? That Manchin’s version will pass, and federal law will require states to do what Georgia—a Republican legislature—has already done.
Senate Republicans: Don’t fall for the trap. You’ve been given a gift, so take it.
Shove a microphone in every Democrat’s face
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, weakly apologized because he belongs to a racist country club. From GoLocal Prov News:
“I think the people who are running the place are still working on that and I’m sorry it hasn't happened yet,” Whitehouse answered the reporter. Bailey’s Beach Club has no Black members, and apparently they can’t find any worthy to join?
The reporter pressed Whitehouse, asking if places like Baileys should even exist if they can’t include minorities. “It's a long tradition in Rhode Island and there are many of them and I think we just need to work our way through the issues.” Yeah.
How about the media shoves a microphone in every Democrat’s face and ask them if “we need to just work our way through the issues” is a good answer, and if they stand by that. Perhaps Black Lives Matter, except on the lily white sands of Rhode Island’s exclusive beaches.
If the media won’t corner every Democrat and shove a microphone in their face to ask how they feel about Whitehouse and his whites-only country club, then Erick Erickson is right: The media is becoming segregationist in alignment with Critical Race Theory (at least how they weaponize it).
Of course there’s a double standard in the media. Gov. Ralph Northam was out celebrating Juneteenth at Fort Monroe, and the media has completely forgotten that he wore blackface. Sen. Whitehouse will be just another footnote when the editorial backhoes finish burying this story.
When the media buries stories like this, they are also burying their own credibility with it. I keep asking the same question: Why should we believe anything they tell us? If they won’t shove a microphone into every Democrat’s face over an overtly racist, exclusive country club Senator, they can’t call anyone a “Country Club Republican.” But they will anyway.
If you haven’t subscribed to the Racket yet, click the button below to do so while it’s still free. And remember, with the Racket you get MORE than what you pay for!
You can also find The Racket News (@newsracket) on Twitter and Facebook. Join the discussion online with our Racketeers Facebook group.
Follow The Racketeers on Twitter: Jay, Steve, and David.
As always, we appreciate shares. If you see something here that you like, please send it to your friends and tell them that all the cool kids read the Racket!
You may be correct. It might cause the democrats to lose some style points but it's too close to risk them being able to bribe a few Senators of both parties. Once it comes to a vote, all it takes is 51-49 or 51-50. I prefer the sure kill rather than relying on Nancy and her gang to screw things up.
It seems wrong that some votes require 60 votes, while others are 50+VP. There's also something to be said about requiring 41 nay votes for a successful filibuster, instead of 60 yea votes to proceed. Right now, a vote could be 59-1 and the bill would still be dead. I'd prefer if either party had to make a real stand on an issue to successfully filibuster.