Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris J. Karr's avatar

"They’d provide food and 'walking around money' to get voters to polls, purposely bring them to precincts where long lines form so they can get a judge to order polls to stay open longer, and leverage provisional ballots for people with no identification whatsoever."

As an election judge, this would piss me off to no end. First of all, there's a lot that you need to get done after the voting is finished, so getting that last voter through the process just kicks off another bunch of stressful work to be done, and the sooner it's done, the happier everyone is. And issuing provisional ballots is a major PITA. In my precinct, our provisional ballots are now done on the single touch-screen machine we have, so clogging up the lines with purposefully-provisional voters whose votes are meant to be thrown out is stupid and wastes everyone's time. To the extent this activity can be detected and the perpetrators be put in legal hot water, the better, as far as I'm concerned.

"Yes, yes, yes. But even worse than that is when the official organ of the state, the CDC, goes back to recommending masks for vaccinated people indoors. Are they daft? Are they mad?"

I live in Blue Chicago, and in the last week, it's become clear that lots of folks here are DONE with masks. The only place where I run into masking requirements these days is public transit and about half the riders are flouting the CTA mask mandate both outside (which doesn't bother me) and on the trains and buses themselves (which does). The CTA isn't enforcing their mandate, so it's entirely honor-system at this point, and based on the number of riders who couldn't give two sh!ts about their fellow riders, trying to re-establish mask mandates beyond the places where they're already being ignored is dead on arrival.

"The vaccination scolds are more concerned with being right than being compassionate, or empathetic to people who’ve been kicked around over their politics and their skepticism for four years. Clearly, the scold approach isn’t working and won’t work. Sympathy should be the response but we get blame instead."

The problem with this is that it's unclear how society can be more sympathetic and expect folks to do the right thing. We've extended the carrots for months now, and we are where we are now with a significant number of resisters who won't do the right thing - no matter how nice you are or how much you try to make them feel good about the shot. The only thing that will convince enough people to get the shot at this point will be the pain and suffering inflicted on their families and local communities, by which time, it'll be too late. Apparently modern germ science is too theoretical for a significant number of Americans to understand.

Expand full comment
Bill Pearson's avatar

I've got to admit Steve, this one threw me. I won't comment on Fulton County, you know Georgia better than I. I have no idea if what you are claiming is true or not, but the goal should be a system that works well...for both parties. Making voting as simple and as efficient is an outcome most states have managed to solve. Stupid "fixes" from either party are well, stupid.

I am more perplexed by this paragraph you wrote: "I understand that masks are the next best thing to vaccination in stopping the spread when herd immunity can’t be achieved. I understand that unvaccinated people will get very sick from the Delta variant, and that Delta seems to spread more easily than the original virus. All true. But we’re talking messaging and politics here, not right and wrong."

Sorry brother, but political messaging is well down my list of what this past year has been all about. In the case of diseases that killed over 600,000 American's my one concern is outcomes. And to be clear, that comes from "right and wrong."

Haranguing about messaging is just more fodder for the foolish. Nope, not calling anyone foolish, simply talking about nonsensical arguments that keep people from doing the right thing. Our only way out of this is herd immunity. We either get there with vaccinations or doubling or tripling the numbers already dead. What is the right choice?

And so we are clear, i did a search to see where masks have been mandated; not much there. I know, you couched this in "recommending masks for vaccinated people indoors"and provided the link. so let's be clear, it is a recommendation and in fact for counties that are facing % increases exceeding certain thresholds. Let me cap it; RECOMMENDATIONS.

You don't want to put one on don't. People refuse to get vaccinated, they won't. It's their choice, but if this once again runs rampant, then what? Are we still going to whine about "political messaging" or are we going to focus on "doing the right thing?"

Hopefully the experts are wrong, the increases they are seeing won't spike. Hopefully it will all "magically go away," (how's that for a political message BTW?). What we do know is we are in the "good times" of summer where folks are outside. When they bring it indoors, what do you expect"

I ask that in all seriousness. I read you in spite of what you write because most often; while i disagree, you are logical and consistent (fairly) in your comments and your positions. This is one of those times where your logic, given what is happening with the Delta variant, just plain misses the mark.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts