Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve Berman's avatar

There *is* a migrant problem, but it's not the one illuminated by the statistics. Many migrants are attracted to/bused in to places like NYC, Boston and Chicago. Those places have "must shelter" laws for homeless and are also "sanctuary cities", refusing to honor or cooperate with ICE detainers. Once there, these migrants, while they process their interminable paperwork for refugee status and a work authorization, consume an enormous amount of resources. They must be housed, fed, and kept from resorting to criminal activity. However, without the ability to work, and limited (in NYC, they're evicting people from the shelters and hotels) housing options, what else do these people have to do but join moped-driving gangs of organized criminals, or survive in squalor? They can't move, because moving to another city invalidates their paperwork.

Our system is broken at the bones. I hate the idea of "camps" but yes, I'd have the federal government use some of the zillions of acres out west to build a whole migrant city, allow companies to set up there with special work authorizations and permits, only good within the city, and let the cream rise and the crime get booted. When paperwork is completed and people have served a year or two in the special zone, they can go out and work anywhere. This would not limit migrants from living where they want--not a prison or concentration camp--but a place they can work and be productive versus getting dumped in a big city where they are becoming a contentious issue (that's giving xenophobes a point to make).

Expand full comment
Jay Berman's avatar

Thank you. Thoughtful with much detail to digest.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts