She's probably just enjoying the attention, but it's good to keep an eye on those possible corruption areas. It's interesting though: I wonder why the judge provided such lenient guidelines on what they can discuss about the proceedings.
Unemployed, 30-year-old, studied theater stuff for one year at a small college, never voted. Makes me think the jury selection process needs some fine tuning. If she and others like her are our peers, we are doomed.
She's probably just enjoying the attention, but it's good to keep an eye on those possible corruption areas. It's interesting though: I wonder why the judge provided such lenient guidelines on what they can discuss about the proceedings.
Unemployed, 30-year-old, studied theater stuff for one year at a small college, never voted. Makes me think the jury selection process needs some fine tuning. If she and others like her are our peers, we are doomed.
Considering we often have under 50% of eligible voters actually voting, yes - those are our peers.
And we are doomed.