Partly it's because these LLMs are just guessing at what answer we want to hear rather than whatever reality actually is - and electoral politics is that much more difficult a subject for it as it involves human feelings in the equation.
Regarding Harris - and really any politician up for election: you end up with campaign promises and policy positions that you can then hold them to during their term. She says she's supporting Lankford's immigration bill, or no longer supports a fracking ban? Hold her to that position: either she follows through, or proves she was lying - and that has repercussions.
Interesting article Steve as AI is even more confusing now than before i read it. We used to debate quantity over quality, but now with AI in our face, we can legitimately question whether either exists.
Funny, as i was reading it, i was struck by the similarities from my Google news feed every morning. Social media has turned news on its ear with a portion of the headlines citing stories of disgruntled posts from users unhappy with a product, person or event.
At best it is disingenuous when someone is unhappy with something, posts a comment online that becomes a meaningless headline. Now it looks like AI will add to our woes of manufactured "news" from social media droppings.
Partly it's because these LLMs are just guessing at what answer we want to hear rather than whatever reality actually is - and electoral politics is that much more difficult a subject for it as it involves human feelings in the equation.
Regarding Harris - and really any politician up for election: you end up with campaign promises and policy positions that you can then hold them to during their term. She says she's supporting Lankford's immigration bill, or no longer supports a fracking ban? Hold her to that position: either she follows through, or proves she was lying - and that has repercussions.
Interesting article Steve as AI is even more confusing now than before i read it. We used to debate quantity over quality, but now with AI in our face, we can legitimately question whether either exists.
Funny, as i was reading it, i was struck by the similarities from my Google news feed every morning. Social media has turned news on its ear with a portion of the headlines citing stories of disgruntled posts from users unhappy with a product, person or event.
At best it is disingenuous when someone is unhappy with something, posts a comment online that becomes a meaningless headline. Now it looks like AI will add to our woes of manufactured "news" from social media droppings.
As you said, AI reflects all the biases that we humans have. Like a pet dog.