Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris J. Karr's avatar

"So, from the viewpoint of 'art,' shame on AMPAS for considering a movie’s popularity as a deficit. I never saw 'The Brutalist,' but I grew up within an hour of Boston, so I’m familiar with the topic. Have you seen Boston’s City Hall? Making a film about the guy who designed such Soviet paeans to dystopian efficiency, and doing it so beautifully, is, to my uncivilized mind, a waste of celluloid, or bytes, or paper folding money, which really is the only thing that matters in Hollywood."

You're letting your dislike of an architectural style keep you away from a great film. I'm no big fan of the Brutalist movement, but the story was more about rebuilding a life after having everything taken from you in a World War in a new nation that isn't sure it wants you around either, your talents and skills be damned.

Plus the film's main character (played by Brody) isn't an actual historical figure, but is a composite of figures from that time.

https://screenrant.com/the-brutalist-true-story-explained/

Expand full comment
Dean Arvidson's avatar

Steve, If I remember correctly in one of your articles a year or two ago you wrote that you welcome comments (feedback) about your writing style (not just the substance of your piece). So, am offering this feedback in a respectful way. When you (or any other writer) uses phrases like 'slobbering fools' to describe a group of people they don't like, it weakens and lessens the effect of the comments and critique in my opinion.

There are many ways to offer criticism that can hit hard, but stooping to the level of insults isn't one of them. In fact, a criticism that is fair and well written is much more effective in making one's point and can indeed cause the person or group being criticized (f they have a chance to read the criticism) to reflect a little and perhaps even teach them something.

This may seem like a minor point to make, but in my mind what is needed now more than ever (given the unprecedented level of division in society and the world) is for each of us to do our best to make sure we are not furthering the divisions by giving into our reactive level of mind and carelessly throwing around insults. If we do give into our reactions and emotions and give voice to that level of reactivity (however good in might feel to do so in the moment), we are part of the problem and not the solution.

In my mind, the teachings and example of Jesus is all about bringing peace and healing to ourselves, others and society at large, and this is what is needed now more than ever! Since you profess a belief in Jesus, I trust you can hear what I'm trying to say here.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts